<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newark: Architecture of Fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/</link>
	<description>Newark 2.0: intelligent conversation, experiments in hyperlocal journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:56:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon Arch Critic</title>
		<link>http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon Arch Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailynewarker.com/2007/12/11/newark-architecture-of-fear/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Yes, a great post Zemin.  Personally I think NJIT is even more guilty than Rutgers of architecturally insulting Newark.  All of NJIT&#039;s Central Avenue buildings blatantly have their backs towards Central Ave and the City of Newark.

At least Rutgers has the New Street corridor, with its broad steps and welcoming gate.  When a college really wants to symbolically demarcate its campus from the outer world it will erect gates like Princeton has on Nassau Street.

When a college really wants to separate itself from the outside community it will do as Seton Hall does and wrap its entire campus in fencing.  Seton Hall&#039;s fencing is, in my opinion, even more difficult to understand than Rutgers&#039; and NJIT&#039;s placement of doors.  It&#039;s one thing for an urban campus in a high crime area to make entry for outsiders difficult, but Seton Hall is in bucolic South Orange, NJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a great post Zemin.  Personally I think NJIT is even more guilty than Rutgers of architecturally insulting Newark.  All of NJIT&#8217;s Central Avenue buildings blatantly have their backs towards Central Ave and the City of Newark.</p>
<p>At least Rutgers has the New Street corridor, with its broad steps and welcoming gate.  When a college really wants to symbolically demarcate its campus from the outer world it will erect gates like Princeton has on Nassau Street.</p>
<p>When a college really wants to separate itself from the outside community it will do as Seton Hall does and wrap its entire campus in fencing.  Seton Hall&#8217;s fencing is, in my opinion, even more difficult to understand than Rutgers&#8217; and NJIT&#8217;s placement of doors.  It&#8217;s one thing for an urban campus in a high crime area to make entry for outsiders difficult, but Seton Hall is in bucolic South Orange, NJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailynewarker.com/2007/12/11/newark-architecture-of-fear/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Great piece, as always Zemin.  Interestingly, the &quot;20 ugliest college campuses&quot; has been making the rounds in the blogosphere:

http://campussqueeze.com/static/20-ugliest-colleges-in-the-USA.html

Number 19 on the list, unsurprisingly, is Rutgers University.  It&#039;s a shame that one of the oldest and most distinguished educational institutions in NJ has such sorry architecture.  I went to Rutgers-Newark for three years -- it really does feel like a prison.  While I welcome changes like the new law building which actually created a walkable quad and opened into Halsey St, the university has a long way to come to create the architectural perception of partnership with the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece, as always Zemin.  Interestingly, the &#8220;20 ugliest college campuses&#8221; has been making the rounds in the blogosphere:</p>
<p><a href="http://campussqueeze.com/static/20-ugliest-colleges-in-the-USA.html" rel="nofollow">http://campussqueeze.com/static/20-ugliest-colleges-in-the-USA.html</a></p>
<p>Number 19 on the list, unsurprisingly, is Rutgers University.  It&#8217;s a shame that one of the oldest and most distinguished educational institutions in NJ has such sorry architecture.  I went to Rutgers-Newark for three years &#8212; it really does feel like a prison.  While I welcome changes like the new law building which actually created a walkable quad and opened into Halsey St, the university has a long way to come to create the architectural perception of partnership with the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danc</title>
		<link>http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>danc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailynewarker.com/2007/12/11/newark-architecture-of-fear/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>A lot can be done to change Newark image.  The city council needs to  start running some psa like Jersey City . Newark has a lot going for it. Most of the ill can be solve by putting people to work. this will give folks a sense of worth and encourage them to bill towards the tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot can be done to change Newark image.  The city council needs to  start running some psa like Jersey City . Newark has a lot going for it. Most of the ill can be solve by putting people to work. this will give folks a sense of worth and encourage them to bill towards the tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is Newark so scary? &#171; The Cranford Pundit.</title>
		<link>http://dailynewarker.com/blog/2007/12/newark-architecture-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is Newark so scary? &#171; The Cranford Pundit.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailynewarker.com/2007/12/11/newark-architecture-of-fear/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>[...] is that? Reputation? Statistical evidence? The Daily Newarker considers the cold and foreboding architecture - which I agree is amazingly dreadful almost across the board in the Brick City and is a factor in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is that? Reputation? Statistical evidence? The Daily Newarker considers the cold and foreboding architecture &#8211; which I agree is amazingly dreadful almost across the board in the Brick City and is a factor in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
