You are browsing the archive for Online.

There is always a victim

July 29, 2008 in Uncategorized by Ken Walker

“There is always a victim”:http://blog.nj.com/njv_thurman_hart/2008/07/there_is_always_a_victim.html

Thurman Hart, who usually blogs at “Blue Jersey”:http://www.bluejersey.com/, reacts to Bob Braun’s “lenient opinion”:http://www.nj.com/columns/ledger/braun/index.ssf?/base/columns-0/121713341649970.xml&coll=1 on the Sharpe James conviction.

I find it difficult to believe that the developer pushed out of the program was a major donor to Sharpe James’ election funds. The lesson: Get on the Mayor’s good side if you want to do business here.

No victims? I suppose none of the inflated costs of doing business in Newark were passed along? Even if it were so, the perception of corruption keeps legitimate businesses out of Newark — and Newark badly needs more legitimate businesses.

Google Maps Street View Now Features Our Fair City

June 11, 2008 in Uncategorized by Ken Walker

“Google Maps”:http://maps.google.com Street View, if you’ve not played with it, provides a street-level view of a given address or intersection — they get this information by literally driving a truck with a 360° camera down every street in the city.

This is an amazing blogging resource of which we’ll be making a lot of use here. I was able to find my apartment and my car very clearly — it was apparently an alternate side parking day. :) Below is a shot of Market and Broad Street.

==

View Larger Map

==

Here are some additional city highlights:

==

==

(Got some more to share? Feel free to drop some links to your favorite Newark sites in the comments.)

Clearly, Parnell and Samburg had it right: “Google Maps is the best! / True that, double true.”:http://www.hulu.com/watch/1397/saturday-night-live-snl-digital-short-lazy-sunday.

NJ Voices Publishes Newark Op-Eds

August 9, 2007 in Uncategorized by Ken Walker

NJ Voices, a new blog project at the Newark Star Ledger, has published a series of opinion/editorial articles from Newarkers and Ledger columnists about Saturday’s shooting of four college students. A number of people including Rutgers-Newark professor and historian Clement Price, columnist Tom Moran and yours truly contributed to this morning’s blog entries:

  • Clement Price, Rutgers-Newark professor and Newark historian: Newark’s nadir.

    Such is a sign of civic maturity that now enables the city’s residents, and others who care for Newark, to deeply grieve the deaths of three youngsters in Vailsburg. That collective grief, not unlike the city’s collective commemoration of 1967, marks a significant turning point for Newark’s civic life and what its residents will increasingly expect from themselves and their young neighbors.

  • Ryan Haygood, attorney and South Ward community leader: A call to action.

    …The truth of the matter is that looking only to external factors, those things outside of us, causes us to lose sight of the solutions to the problems that soil our moral and social fabric.

    Some of those solutions are inside of us.

  • Bob Braun, Star Ledger columnist: Three deaths in Newark.

    We think an arts center and a stadium and a Starbucks or two represent a Renaissance, when what is really needed are jobs, health care, and housing.

  • Tom Moran, Star Ledger columnist: For a desperate city, a defining moment

    Newarkers are going to have to come up large in another way, too. They have to tell police what they see and hear, and take the risk of testifying at trial — both major problems in fighting violent crime.

  • Carl Golden, former press secretary for Governor Kean and Republican consultant: The challenge for Booker.  

    It will be necessary for Booker to reach deeper into the well of his commitment and dedication to meet the challenge posed by this crime. His honesty, decency, and work ethic are all admirable traits for a public official, but Booker is intelligent enough to know that none of it will mean much if Newark adds to its reputation as the place where three innocent and promising lives were obliterated without consequence. 

  • Terry Golway, curator of the John T. Kean Center for American History at Kean University: Not just a Newark story.

     …It’s a fact of life that Newark’s revival depends upon the willingness of non-city residents to bring themselves and their kids into the city. And New Jersey needs a revival in Newark and other distressed urban areas. Morally and economically, we can’t afford to see our cities fail. 

  • Jim McQueeny, president and CEO of Winning Strategies Public Relations in Newark: Street fight or street flight?

     In reality, the plan was probably always bouncing between hope and hype. The latter is on full display in the Administration’s gushy and glossy 100 day progress report that was issued last year, and it was rightfully ridiculed into oblivion shortly thereafter as a superficial media approach to governing. And, judging by the unabated murder rate in town, the bad guys never got the message in that brochure either.

  • Star Ledger Editorial Board: The battle for Newark.  

    The percentage points mean nothing in the context of weekends like the one just past. For one neighborhood, the violence quotient climbed exponentially. For a few grieving families, the homicide rate hit the stratosphere and is never coming down. What good is it to claim that Newark’s 60 homicides so far this year are three fewer than this time last year when one bloody weekend proves that statistical victories can be obliterated in a staccato of gunfire?

  • Ken Walker, editor of The Daily Newarker: Ending Newark’s Lawlessness.

     I think it’s the contrast of this audacious lawlessness against the backdrop of Newark’s progress that makes these killings so shocking. Violent crime is the single largest obstacle to any hope of the city’s recovery; promising crime statistics and development ring hollow to residents and outsiders alike who fear for their lives inside city limits.If Newark has any hope of restoration, it will be in the city’s ability to capture, prosecute and convict the murderers of these students. We must be able to show that these crimes will not be tolerated anymore.

by jeff

Ironbound Walking Tour – this Sat/Banner for Newarkhistory.com

August 8, 2007 in Uncategorized by jeff

Hi, a two purpose post here . .. .

Just a reminder, my Ironbound walking tour is going to be this Saturday at 2:30. Meet at the church at the intersection of McWhorter & Ferry Street. The tour will last just under two hours and will end where we start. The cost is $5 if this is your first tour, free if you’ve been on a tour before and paid for that previous tour.

The tour will run no matter how hot it gets, but intense thunderstorms will cause the tour to be postponed to the Sunday rain date. The forecast is for partly cloudy, in the 70s.

http://www.newarkhistory.com/ironboundtour.html

Other news . . . .

If you’ve ever checked out my website, www.newarkhistory.com, you know that my web design skills are primitive. For over a year I’ve wanted to have a nice banner for the top of the mainpage. Is there anyone out there who can help me? You can use whatever creative skills you have, and you can get credit for the banner, but I can’t pay you. A nice banner might be a pic of the Newark skyline with “Newarkology” or “Newarkhistory.com” superimposed. Another idea would be a few images fading into one other. Like a pic of the Newark skyline, then a crowd scene from the Old Days, then a close up of a Newark park. My only standard is that the banner look more professional than what I have now.

Newark 1967 at NJ.com

July 9, 2007 in History by Ken Walker

NJ.com has launched a portal called “Newark 1967″:http://www.nj.com/newark1967/ covering the summer of discontent in the city of Newark that began with the riots on July 12, forty years ago. They’re featuring research, upcoming events, video interviews, and a four-part series of articles entitled “Crossroads.” Here’s an excerpt from “part one of the series”:http://blog.nj.com/ledgernewark/2007/07/crossroads_part_1.html

He thought it was some kind of providence, the perfect confluence of a man, a time and a place.

The man was David Suchow, a 37-year-old pharmacist. The time was 1955. The place was the corner of Springfield Avenue and Bergen Street in Newark, where Suchow had just been given the opportunity to buy a pharmacy, Post Drugs, for no money down and a reasonable monthly payment.

To Suchow, it looked like a future. The location was in the middle of a two-mile-long commercial corridor stretching from Newark’s downtown to its outskirts. In the days before shopping malls, Springfield Avenue was what shopping malls later would aspire to be.

“It was a hustling, bustling area,” said Suchow, now 89 and living in Hunterdon County. “Back in my day, we called it action. It had great action, a lot of foot traffic.”

What he couldn’t know in those optimistic times was just how quickly the action was changing. A little more than a decade later, Suchow’s corner and the blocks around it were the epicenter of one of the most severe civil disturbances in American history, a spasm of racially steeped violence and destruction that began one hot July evening in 1967 and ended five days later with 26 deaths and $10 million in damage.

As the city prepares to mark the 40th anniversary of the event, The Star-Ledger is examining the Newark riots from the vantage point of the neighborhood around Springfield and Bergen. Today and for the next three days, more than 50 years of the area’s history will be revisited – from gilded commercial strip to riot-shredded shell, then from vacated inner-city wasteland to urban-redevelopment success story.

Drawing on thousands of pages of documents recently discovered in State Police headquarters, four decades of scholarly research, and the living memory of dozens who crossed through the neighborhood, this four-part series will debunk some popular myths. Among them:

* The riots were responsible for the decline that turned Newark into one of America’s most desperate cities. In reality, the city had long been in a downward spiral which by 1967 created an atmosphere ripe for unrest.
* The riots were sparked by a rumor that cabdriver John Smith had been beaten to death by police. In fact, the serious looting didn’t begin until nearly 24 hours later, when a rally staged by community activists got out of hand. By that point, the rumor of Smith’s death had already been dispelled.
* The riots caused most businesses along Springfield Avenue to immediately close. To the contrary, 83 percent of businesses in the riot area reopened. They shuttered in the coming months and years when owners realized their suburban customers were too scared to return.

The series also will reveal some never-before-reported details about the disorders. Among them:

* Mayor Hugh Addonizio did not want to call in the State Police and National Guard, going so far as to cancel a request from his police department for assistance. But a report of looting at Sears Roebuck, which sold guns, forced his hand.
* The “Soul Brother riots,” when rogue members of the State Police shot hundreds of windows owned by black businessmen, appear to have been planned to coincide with a press conference, a time when most reporters and photographers were not on the streets to observe the troopers’ behavior.
* The sniper fire, on which many of the 26 riot deaths were blamed, was mainly gunfire from authorities, not snipers, who unwittingly shot at each other as a result of a communication breakdown.

Springfield and Bergen was a main crossroads in the neighborhood where the trouble began, a hub around which much of the damage revolved, and it is now a symbol of the recovery that has taken place.

It also is a living reminder that in an ever-changing city like Newark, a junction like Springfield and Bergen is more than just a place where two roads cross. It is a place for intersections of other sorts – of people, events and the forces of history.

by emma

Newark, NJ, Ireland and Being Home

June 16, 2007 in Featured, History by emma

Conor McGrady, one of the artists I invited to show at Gallery Aferro this month, was born and raised in Northern Ireland during the 70’s and 80’s. His large (4×8 and 4×15 foot) drawings are done from memory, and depict the neighborhoods, blocks and housing structures of his childhood. The technical skill and scale of the work is mind-blowing, leading to McGrady’s inclusion in the 2002 Whitney Biennial, and I am very proud to be showing them here in Newark.

Visitors to the gallery this week have consistently assumed that the drawings depicted Newark. In some cases, a viewer has been sure that a drawing was of their block, their home: “it’s Hawthorne!” Conor and I both guessed this would happen. It speaks to the tendency, shared by almost all of us, to look for home, everywhere.

Another artist we invited to Newark for a previous show, “Glossolalia,” is a German living in New York named Christian Marc Schmidt. After some discussion with us, he researched Newark and designed a piece that cycles through the name of every street in Newark. Using two projectors, it presents two street names at a time, some of which exist as physical intersections, and some of which don’t. The piece is a sound-sensative font that deforms based on the volume of noise it is subjected to.

After a while, word spread about the piece and teenage visitors would visit the gallery with their friends to wait for the name of their street to appear on the wall, and shout at it, either in praise or to vent anger towards it.

I would very much like to bring back the piece at some point as a commissioned, permanent display for the people of the city of Newark.

Newark Cops Lose Jobs Over Internet Posts

July 12, 2006 in Uncategorized by Ken Walker

Update!: There’s “some contention over at Newark Speaks”:http://www.newarkspeaks.com/forum/showthread.php?p=26696#post26696 over the owner of the site and how the administrator was subpoenaed for information in this case. The administrator contends that the ??Newark Star Ledger?? got their information wrong, but that they did supply information that led to the identiy and dismissal of the two officers. While Newark Speaks insists that they support the officers’ First Amendment rights, many regulars at the board are accusing that the administrators of selling out their users. Dishy.

??Newark Star Ledger??: “Newark police fire two for Web criticisms”:http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-3/11526847464680.xml&coll=1. In a story that’s near and dear to our heart, two Newark police officers have been fired over posts on an internet message board, namely: “Newark Speaks”:http://newarkspeaks.com/forum.

The department learned the officers’ names with the help of the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, which issued grand jury subpoenas to Newark Speaks, cable companies and others to obtain the information, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the investigation.

Rubin Sinins, the attorney hired by the police union to represent all four officers, said the actions against them violate their constitutional right to free speech.

Sinins said he is appealing the two dismissals to the state Merit System Board and has asked to meet with the new acting police chief, Anthony Campos. He said he would urge Campos to rescind the dismissals and drop the pending charges against the other officers.

“I don’t believe that public employees lose their First Amendment rights as citizens, particularly when the speech pertains to matters of public concern,” Sinins said.

“The reaction over at Newark Speaks”:http://www.newarkspeaks.com/forum/showthread.php?p=26681#post26681 has been critical of a police administration that has its priorities misplaced. ??5Reasons?? sums up the reaction well:

It figures that Newark Speaks would be at the center of free speech/thought police controversy. After all, this machine has had a good run with nearly unchecked powers for multiple decades. Lord knows there have been a lot of dirt done during this timeframe. And Lord knows what they have to hide at this point. Whenever any dictator can’t control information, and whenever any dictator sees that their propaganda frame is no longer the dominant reference point, they invariably act to shut down the promulgators. (That would be us)

You would think with all the indiscretions this administration and Council have done over the years that they would leave quietly. Think again. This is one last act to scare the masses because as we’ve all learned these last few months, the Internet is mightier than the sword. If you cannot suppress the ideas, suppress the idea-makers.

Shame on the Fox Ledger for finally getting the words “Newark Speaks” into a daily edition. Yeah, we’ve been cited by online journals by the New York Times and Ledger, but the relevancy of this website really warranted an article a very long time ago.

Let’s hope the Ledger at least follows up on this story and the broader implications of this case. Where does free speech begin and end? How much hegemony should the political class have over the social construction of reality?

Newark06 Hangs It Up

May 22, 2006 in Uncategorized by Ken Walker

??Newark06??: “Our Final Post: Goodbye and Thanks”:http://newark06.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=205. After several months of dedicated around-the-clock reporting, the Newark06 blog at the New York Times is closing their doors. It’s too bad — I was getting used to hearing from the Times about Newark on a daily basis.

Newark06 started with the lofty goal of trying to understand and explain the carnival funhouse of Newark politics. We expected ugliness and debate. We expected a campaign that would resonate nationally with issues of race and class bubbling up as they did in 2002 when Mayor Sharpe James and Cory Booker fought a sandpaper-on-skin “Street Fight” that rubbed the city raw.

On our first day, Mayor James showed up on a police bicycle at City Hall, in a tank top with his biceps bulging, to file his petitions to get on the ballot. When he dropped out a week later, some of our colleagues and fellow bloggers offered sympathy for the loss of a vainglorious character that would have kept us busy.

But it hardly mattered and, in fact, the lack of a re-match between the incumbent and the upstart may have helped. It pushed us to cover not just the horse race of a campaign but also the city – its voters, its quirks, its concerns – and to work harder at putting Newark in perspective.