No Logo, Newark!

In this hot summer day, there is no place better than my favorite Newark coffee shop, where my children and I can spend hours reading in cool air and refreshing aromas. We keep getting distracted, pleasantly. On the next table, six deaf people are “talking” all at once, with 12 excited hands waving in the air. On the other side, an old couples and their grandson are enthusiastically eating crispy Cuban sandwiches and fried codfish balls.
The lunch crowd is filing in from different directions. My 9-year-old daughter comments on uniformed nurses, muscular brick workers, and a few regular old Irishmen chatting furtively, “Dad, these are real people!” Two small TV screens are silently showing a fierce soccer match. There is no soft Jazz of urban sophistication in an upscale atmosphere that entices customers to pay $4 for their daily caffeine fix. In fact, even after a few years, I still pronounce my coffee order of $1.50 sheepishly: G-A-L-A-O.

Café Caffe of 274 Chestnut Street is not closing, even without our mayor offering help of city incentives, like he promised to the closing of Starbucks at 744 Broad Street. As CBS reported, the decision by Starbucks to close 600 stores nationwide has hit this Newark location especially hard. After the recent closure of Old Navy and Kinko’s, both around the premier spot in the city’s heart, people responded angrily on losing this window of a ubiquitous coffee chain.

It is hard to swallow the grief of being deprived of the corporate seal of approval for the long cheered revitalization. “Yes, you have invested over $300 million on the brand new arena. Yes, the long-waited multimillion dollar Broad Street beautification project is about to be completed. But you are not good enough yet,” the corporate world said loudly. In fact, for decades, Newarkers have been ridiculed by the rest of the world, particularly by the affluent Jersey suburbanites, who find it hard to lose the symbol of all social illness and political corruption.

The outgoing President of Starbucks, Jim Alling, proudly called his people “the little-pick-uppers.” He said, “We just naturally stop down to pick up that gum wrapper or soda can on the sidewalk as we’re talking with you about how the kids are doing and what crazy weather we are having….” Blah, blah, blah… He quickly added, “Profitability is essential to our future success.”

Obviously, Starbucks, or any corporate big name, is made by neither an altruistic Mother Teresa, nor a paternalist Federal government. In Starbucks’ case, it goes as far as to declare “diversity” one of its guiding principles, and to hire Magic Johnson as its representative. However, a casual google of “Starbucks Gary Indiana” will find nothing but ten shops in the surrounding area. Similarly here, except its inner cities, New Jersey has one of the highest concentrations of the latte chain shops, as well as almost all brand-name retailers, in the nation.

Bryant Simon, a professor at Temple University, who is writing a book about the coffee chain, observed the lone Starbucks in Harlem in 2006. The dingy store was busy and cramped and lacked the usual niceties like upholstered furniture. “It’s a classic American story,” he said, “African-Americans get less of everything.”

My take, however, can be a little different. God designates Newarkers a totally different path. We, ordinary citizens, political leaders, and city planners, should have listened to the corporate voice more clearly. If the city does not deserve “Main Street” services, Newark should just as well block those fast food brand-names, like Southern Californian cities are doing.

We need some heavy-lifters, not “little-pick-uppers,” no matter what they pick up. After all, we have our own successful stories. Next to Café Caffe, there is a new copy shop, PrintPost. Arthur Stern, the owner of 744 Broad Street, can easily refill the space of Kinko’s and Starbucks with the much superior pair of Chestnut Street shops. Our mayor will save some city money and trips to trade shows in Las Vegas to lure brand names.

No Logo in a prosperous Newark, would that be cool?

Author: Ken Walker

Husband, Father, Newarker, PCA Elder, Business Analyst. In a glass case of emotion since 1978.

5 thoughts on “No Logo, Newark!”

  1. I think you’re missing the point in your analysis. No city gets by only with heavy lifters; it requires a mix of picker-uppers and heavy lifters to thrive. Broad Street without Starbucks is a collection of shuttered shops, discount clothing stores, and carts selling bootleg DVDs. The store offered a touch of badly needed class to the city’s major thoroughfare. By no means should the mayor be offering economic incentives to keep Starbucks, but the city should have been seeking to bring the store some brand-name company in the eight years since it opened, in order to make sales more robust. Booker has made that a priority, and should continue to do so, but not at the cost of crushing places like Caffe or Ward’s.Logos, in short, are where tax revenues come from, which is where the money to rebuild Newark comes from. Look at where Newark would be without the brand-name presence of companies like Prudential or Horizon. Newark deserves “Main Street services,” but must work to balance the interests of national chains and the importance of unique local stores if it wants to suceed.

    Like

  2. Just for some ha-ha’s. In the Newark Public Library, one can find a movie, Starbucking, featuring a Mr. John Winter, who has visited 6,000 Starbucks worldwide since 1997. Mr. Winter has compiled possibly the most comprehensive list of responses towards the closures of 600 Starbucks in his website, http://www.starbuckseverywhere.net. Newark’s response has been very unusual. I was told by an employee at the Broad Street store that the regional manager was surprised by the stir surrounding the closure in Newark.

    Like

  3. I’m surprised about the brouhaha over the Broad Street Starbucks being put on the closure list. These things are bound to happen when large chains that monopolize a particular product simply peak and cannot grow in any more meaningful ways. The signs were all there: Starbucks buying other coffee chains to maintain its growth, then trying to market its coffee through fast-food chains (McDonald’s, I think), and now, closing down stores. While I can understand people’s disappointment (a little; I’m a tea drinker myself) in losing that store, I think it’s better to aggressively recruit up-and-coming restaurants or other types of retailers that are doing things differently, are run well (unlike the Old Navy) and have a good future ahead of them.
    At least The Children’s Place is still on Broad Street. And that corner location might make tempting bait for a bank branch, especially a community or regional bank that didn’t lose its mind and morals during the housing expansion. The landlord and the city will figure out something.

    Like

  4. Did anyone else notice that the name of the outgoing Starbucks President is Jim ALLING, like the long-ago Newark furniture company and street near Nwk Penn Station? I wonder if he’s one of those Allings.
    As for national chains, think about this: every national chain started somewhere in particular. Maybe there is a Newark entrepreneur capable of creating a business that others will want to buy franchises in. Prudential started in Newark, and now operates around the world. The lack of national, and international, outlets leaves room for Newarkers to fill their niches, and perhaps create something so distinctive that other people, from other cities, will want to get in on it. Stranger things have happened.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s